AHDB Beef and Lamb has released its latest benchmarking figures for English beef and sheep enterprises. The figures in the 2016 Stocktake Report relate to the year ending 31st March 2016. The table belowshows the net margins for each enterprise for the last two years and the difference between the average producer and a top third producer where available.
In the main, the cattle margins are better than last year and improved compared to the last three years; only beef finishing up to 16 months bucks the trend. The top third of sheep enterprises continue to see positive returns, but the average producer for both beef and sheep enterprises continue to struggle to make a positive net margin return. It should be noted that the results do not include income from the Basic Payment Scheme, any Agri-environment payments or diversification income. Many of these types of farms will be reliant on such income to produce an overall farm profit.
The figures below are only for the top third and average producers, there is a significant further gap to the bottom third producers. The level of fixed costs between the top third of producers and the average show a marked difference, highlighting the importance of looking at total costs rather than just the gross margin. In addition, there is a difference in the physical performance, particularly within the suckler herds. For example, the Non-SDA top third of producers had shorter calving periods, more calves born alive and a lower percentage of empty cows or heifers. The report aims to offer benchmarking figures and physical information for producers to compare their enterprises against. This year, for the first time, there is space to put producer’s own figures in.
For the second year, international comparisons have also been included in the report. These were compared on the basis of US Dollars and therefore some exchange rate impacts are felt. For suckler herds, once again only the US had returns greater than costs. The UK (upland farm) and Germany were again the only countries to have returns lower than their cash costs (i.e. those costs not including imputed rent, unpaid labour, depreciation and finance). For finishing units, the USA and China had returns higher than costs whilst for sheep breeding enterprises, New Zealand and China were profitable.
ENTERPRISE NET MARGINS 2014/15 AND 2015/16 – Source: AHDB |
|
2014/15
|
2015/16
|
|
Average
|
Top Third
|
Average
|
Top Third
|
Lowland Suckler Herds (£ per cow to bull) |
-218.45
|
-42.88
|
-155.76
|
26.53
|
SDA Suckler Herds (£ per cow to bull) |
-124.79
|
23.13
|
2.82
|
134.36
|
Combined Breeding/ Finisher (£ per cow to bull) |
-323.05
|
12.97
|
-203.07
|
n/a
|
Combined Breeding/Stores (£ per cow to bull) |
-268.26
|
n/a
|
-348.29
|
n/a
|
Beef Finishing up to 16 months (£ per head) |
-207.76
|
24.53
|
-117.35
|
-19.60
|
Beef Finishing 16 months & over (£ per head) |
-208.91
|
41.36
|
-67.29
|
52.86
|
Store Rearers (£ per head) |
-127.50
|
-17.91
|
-87.35
|
41.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lowland Breeding Flocks (£ per ewe to ram) |
-7.59
|
14.53
|
-6.34
|
17.36
|
SDA Breeding Flocks(£ per ewe to ram) |
-1.95
|
23.59
|
-3.55
|
17.61
|
Store Lamb Finishing (£ per head) |
0.43
|
9.77
|
0.15
|
6.28
|
|
The full report can be downloaded from http://beefandlamb.ahdb.org.uk/returns/stocktake/